Ontario On Federal Welfare Because Of Green Energy Policies by Tim Ball

Published April 1, 2015

“To take from one, because it is thought his own industry and that of his fathers has acquired too much, in order to spare to others, who, or whose fathers, have not exercised equal industry and skill, is to violate arbitrarily the first principle of association, the guarantee to everyone the free exercise of his industry and the fruits acquired by it.”
Thomas Jefferson, letter to Joseph Milligan, 1816

I stopped golfing because my game really did ruin a good walk. While I was playing, I learned there were many aspects of the game with affinity to life. One was that you have 20 bad shots and are ready to quit, but one good shot keeps you going for 20 more bad ones. Another that perplexed me was the requirement for and use of a handicap. The joke among good golfers is that in a tournament you fear the high handicapper with a hot putter. It speaks to the fact that the handicap is a pure form of socialism. Instead of winning on personal merit and ability, you can win because of a statistical adjustment – an equalization.

Canada has a federal process that is similar to the golf handicap system. It is called “equalization payments”. Many consider it sacrosanct and untouchable, but in reality it masks and perpetuates real problems. Formalized in 1957, it initially planned to give residents of each province the same per capita revenue as those in the two wealthiest provinces British Columbia and Ontario using personal, corporate and inheritance taxes. Like all government programs they are never reduced but grow, almost always for political rather than practical reasons. In 1962 they added 50 percent of natural resource income to the mix, and in 1967 they expanded it to include all government revenues, except energy. It is reported that Canada now has the most expansive and generous, redistribution of wealth system, in the world. To guarantee the continuance of the system it was included, by an amendment to the constitution, through the Canada Act 1982. This was the Act that transferred political power to Ottawa from Westminster, and used as an opportunity to entrench such political ideologies.

Provinces are designated, ”have” or “have not”, based upon their ability to generate tax revenue. A dramatic turn occurred in 2009-2010 because Ontario, the only “have” province, from the start, became a “have not’ province. Newfoundland and Labrador, a “have not” province from the start, became a “have” province.

In 1992, when Ontario was a “have” province, Maurice Strong was appointed Chairman of Ontario Hydro. In that same year he chaired the “Earth Summit” of the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP), in Rio, a conference he promulgated and organized. At that conference, the concepts of global warming, as a threat to the planet, were formalized. Through the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) they formed the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). The objective was to produce the science that human CO2 was causing global warming. It began with the direction to use the definition of climate change approved by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC).

Article 1 of the UNFCCC at the “Earth Summit”, defined Climate Change as:

a change of climate which is attributed directly or indirectly to human activity that alters the composition of the global atmosphere and which is in addition to natural climate variability observed over considerable time periods.

This makes the human impact the primary purpose of the research. The problem is you cannot determine human contribution unless you know the amount and cause of natural climate change.

The IPCC has failed. We know that, because science is tested by its ability to predict and every prediction they have made was wrong. But before that was even established, Maurice Strong applied the green energy policies, they claimed were necessary, to offset global warming to the Province Ontario.

Strong’s plan for Ontario was illogical and damaging on many levels. As one report noted,

“Within no time of his arrival, he firmly redirected and re-structured Ontario Hydro. At the time, Ontario Hydro was hell-bent on building many more nuclear reactors, despite dropping demand and rising prices. Maurice Strong grabbed the Corporation by the scruff of the neck, reduced the workforce by one third, stopped the nuclear expansion plans, cut capital expenditures, froze the price of electricity, pushed for sustainable development, made business units more accountable.”

It was supposedly designed to reduce production of CO2, but cancelled nuclear power plant construction. It built windmills that are very inefficient and kill birds and bats by the millions, but do not reduce CO2 production. Wind does not blow all the time or even steadily, therefore power production is intermittent. This means fossil fuel power plants must be kept running all the time, since the pick up must be immediate and seamless, so there is no drop in power. Most systems restrict wind power input to 12 percent because, if the wind stops blowing, anything more causes an overload.

Ontario became the testing ground for Strong’s green energy policy and the people are paying a very high price. Worse, it is completely unnecessary, because the justification for adopting the policy that human CO2 was causing global warming, is wrong. For the last 19 years, global temperature has leveled and declined while CO2 levels continue to increase.

Further proof of the failure of the green agenda and energy policies is they are failing in every country where they were adopted. Germany is a good example as a March 14, 2013 Forbes article notes.

There’s nothing wrong with expanding renewable energy sources. The more choices available in this (or any) marketplace the better consumers will be served – both from a price and a quality standpoint. However serious problems are caused when government starts using taxpayer resources to subsidize or incentivize these expansions. Things get even worse when centralized planners start manipulating market choices or trying to manage the marketplace itself by controlling the generation of power.

The article title is “Germany’s Green Energy Disaster: A Cautionary Tale For World Leaders”. Change Germany to Ontario and the world leaders would have known, back in 2003, when Dalton McGuinty was elected. The after effects of Strong’s policies kept accumulating, so a 2010 Toronto Sun headline warned, “Expect a 46% hydro rate.” Strong’s policies were continued and exacerbated because of the political input of David Suzuki in McGuinty’s re-election; actions that forced Suzuki to resign from his Foundation.

The Ontario government of Premier Kathleen Wynne, continues the destructive policies instead of recognizing the root cause. The reason is because the real economic and social costs of the damaging energy policies are masked by Federal Transfer payments. In 2009 – 2010 Ontario received $347 million in transfer payments, while Newfoundland received nothing. Table 1 shows the total transfer payments to Ontario including equalization.

federal-support-graph

Transfers allow Ontario leaders to avoid facing reality. Worse, it allows them to pursue even more damaging policies. For example, McGuinty and Wynne have both pushed fracking aside, even though the claims of damage are proved wrong. They refuse to allow development of nuclear power, which is already proved as a reliable safe source, in Ontario, and with advances in technology can be cheaper and more efficient. Look at the success story and safety record in France, where nuclear has dominated power production since 1984.

electricity-production-graph

Ironically, France, under the socialist government of Francois Hollande, was elected in 2012 proposing a one-third reduction of nuclear power by 2025. Wynne is planning to add insult to injury with a proposed “carbon tax”. Why do people keep voting for those who promise programs that are proven failures? The answer is partly provided by a 19th century quote.

A democracy cannot survive as a permanent form of government. It can last only until its citizens discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority who vote will vote for the candidates promising the greatest benefits from the public purse, with the result that a democracy will always collapse from loose fiscal policies, always followed with a dictatorship.

George Bernard Shaw summarized the reality in stark terms. “A government with the policy to rob Peter to pay Paul can be assured of the support of Paul.” The Canadian equalization scheme aids and abets this by protecting governments from accountability for their failed policies. What makes it worse, is the policy was chosen to reduce CO2 emissions, adopted blindly by ideologues who did not look at or understand the science.

6 Responses to “Ontario On Federal Welfare Because Of Green Energy Policies by Tim Ball”

  1. Robbie April 6, 2015

    Why doesn’t Mike not put a golf course on his land and leave the rest of us to choose what to do with our land? I am not the least bit interested in telling him what to do! It’s called freedom, a concept unknown these days.
    I have worked in the golf industry for 57 years and have just retired. We employed workers for all aspects of the operation. The Christmas party would be attended by over one hundred workers.
    Our land was recognized by the Audubon Society as a wild life sanctuary. We provide habitat for all manner of birds and animals. If you want to see a bluebird, go to a golf course.
    For me, the whole point of the Landowner’s Association is to give owners the ability to do with their land what they feel is best.

  2. mike April 1, 2015

    Incidentally we cherish our title to land because we like,enjoy and live of our land.Since golf greens require pesticide and herbicide pollution and great quantities of water reserves,why dont we close them down and resort to the original game and give golfers a bag of marbles and they can make their own holes in the ground.Hope the math questions below dont get any more difficult or it might reduce the comments,lol.

  3. mike April 1, 2015

    Canada is not made up of separate states as is Europe.So we should expect that transfer payments are for the benefit of the whole,otherwise we can question the federal debt that Ottawa makes for all the provinces and are the benefits equalized to all provinces.Questions that arise are;is Nfld agreeing to go to war with Afghanistan,Iraq,and now Syria?How much pollution results from 7 days of bombing Baghdad with nuclear warheads whso fallout reached the Bahamas within 24 hours?When it takes 8 litres of deisel fuel to start a tank motor?Why aren’t Thorium reactors financed?Did you know that Edison wanted to use DC current and Tesla was the person who set up Niagara power generation?Terrorism has no definitive definition,but we all know that when you poke a bees nest with a stick it’s probable that you can get stung

  4. jim malloy April 1, 2015

    It was indeed a sad day when Wynne was elected to ruin Ontario with the full support of her puppets seated around her. Her thought process is extremely flawed and her major concentration is on teaching our children to be gay using the guidelines of her jailed ex minister child porn lover.

  5. Michael Foers April 1, 2015

    Excellent article. I’ve been ranting about the Ontario Liberal’s Green Energy Policies for a few years. Not many want to hear about it or get it, but some do. Unfortunately, unions spending millions on attack ads will likely decide who wins the next election.

  6. Andy Terauds April 1, 2015

    In 1971, while I was in university I remember a report that Patrick McTaggert-Cowan, a world renowned meteorologist speaking in (I believe) Toronto, said that the world has just gone through the quietest 50 years of weather it has ever seen. Society must be prepared to see much greater fluctuations in weather in our future. If you can find his statement, that would be useful in these arguments.


Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

E-Newsletter!
Get all the latest OLA news
delivered monthly right to your inbox!