When Is A City Too Big? By The Contrarian
- 2018-03-01
- By admin
- Posted in Latest News
There is a theory in urban planning that there is an optimum size for a city. Quality of life gets better as the city gets bigger up to the optimum size, and then the problems grow while the benefits do not, and quality of life is diminished.
As towns and cities get bigger, more and better recreation facilities can be afforded; there is more variety of shopping and things to do; folks have to travel less for medical specialties; education facilities including a university become possible; public transit gets better; major league sports franchises arrive; high level cultural amenities such as an opera hall or a symphony orchestra are possible; world class medical care, hospitals, specialists become available.
As towns and cities become bigger, the sense of community, of belonging, disappears; traffic congestion gets worse; there is more and more crime and the community is not as safe; smog is a factor, and air and water pollution problems emerge; the connection to the land is lost, local food is not available.
Somewhere in there, the lines cross, the things that get better reach a plateau, more than one university or large hospital is no improvement, while the problems of pollution and crime and gridlock, and above all loss of community just keep growing. Textbooks suggest the optimum size is around 300 000 people – large enough for a university, a major league franchise, a world class hospital.
Some of us might think the optimum is a lot smaller, say like Thunder Bay, and some might argue it needs to be even bigger, say a half a million. The point is we can all agree there is an optimum and bigger after that is not better for anybody.
Of course, cities need to be spaced out so that they are not merely suburbs, there needs to be enough distance between so there is space to handle pollution problems, and open country for food production and recreation opportunities. Textbooks suggest that spacing needs to be at least 50 miles of open country between urban areas.
So, we can all agree there is an ideal, say cities of no more than 300 000, spaced no less than 50 miles apart. This is recognized by such initiatives as the Green Belt idea around Toronto; now languishing as Ontario half-heartedly resists the blandishments of developers. Or the effort a few decades ago to spread government services/jobs around the province, such as printing lottery tickets in Sault St Marie (whoop-de-doo!). But overall, only half-hearted efforts to address the ‘too big’ problem.
Canada was built by immigrants, who came here to make a home, and who went to the end of the road to make that home, that is, literally built the country. They came to be citizens and accepted our language and our culture. But in recent decades, much of what we do pushes immigrants to our largest cities, cities which by any measure are already much larger than the optimum. In ghettos where they do not learn our language and our culture, and do not become Canadians, their prospects are limited, and we have in fact done them a great disservice.
One has to ask, what useful purpose does it serve to bring people here and put them into ghettos in cities already too large? All the while busily emptying our countryside in favour of growing those too big cities even bigger? Instead, we should be encouraging new immigrants to disperse across the country and help to build a strong and united Canada? Buys votes, I suppose.
Search:
Categories
Archives
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- June 2013
- April 2013
- October 2012
- May 2012
- September 2011